"He wears gingham and gothic baby-doll dresses to the office and his work profile picture shows him in a frilly dress with pigtails, holding a teddy bear."
JFC! Having to work with a fetishist like that in an office! If a woman tried this she'd be told in no uncertain terms that she was unprofessional. But pull out the gender card and you'll be indulged.
“Language is inherently dynamic... We will continue striving to offer language that is as inclusive as possible and that reflects the diversity embodied in science.”
It‘s funny how people and institutions immediately start to sound like robots as soon as they go full gender ideology. That quote starts with a platitude and ends in pretty much nothing. For it to make a relevant point, shouldn't it go on to explain how and why the ‘diversity embodied in science’ implies that the 'individuals of child-bearing potential' aren't necessarily 'women'? But that would be telling, wouldn't it?
Now that a crap body of literature backing gender ideology has been crow-barred into once-reputable journals, there's a half-hearted move on the part of TRAs to justify themselves by referring, in a hand-waving manner, to 'the latest science'. The idea seems to be to use 'the latest science' to one-up those who come at them with plain 'science'
Satan is having a field day amongst our illiberal Western elites. Thanks for this article revealing just how extreme the situation has now become. What used to be fringe and suspicious is now being paraded as mainstream and normative. To call it insanity is, alas, to grossly underestimate the full sordid depth of what is going on.
Did you get an answer from the EMA about what how we’re supposed to understand the word “women” in their communicuations?
I got wind of their ICH E21 guideline during the consultation phase. I made a mental note to contribute but in the end I didn’t. The superficial excuse is that I didn’t have time but the truth is that I would have found time if I didn’t feel that it was just a PR exercise and that they’ll do whatever they want anyway.
On a broader level, I’m very uneasy about this new drive to recruit pregnant women into clinical studies of experimental medicines. I hate the way it's being reframed as a rights issue. If the clinical trial guidelines are changed, I'm sure that once again it's the most vulnerable women whose unborn babies will be harmed.
"He wears gingham and gothic baby-doll dresses to the office and his work profile picture shows him in a frilly dress with pigtails, holding a teddy bear."
JFC! Having to work with a fetishist like that in an office! If a woman tried this she'd be told in no uncertain terms that she was unprofessional. But pull out the gender card and you'll be indulged.
“Language is inherently dynamic... We will continue striving to offer language that is as inclusive as possible and that reflects the diversity embodied in science.”
It‘s funny how people and institutions immediately start to sound like robots as soon as they go full gender ideology. That quote starts with a platitude and ends in pretty much nothing. For it to make a relevant point, shouldn't it go on to explain how and why the ‘diversity embodied in science’ implies that the 'individuals of child-bearing potential' aren't necessarily 'women'? But that would be telling, wouldn't it?
Now that a crap body of literature backing gender ideology has been crow-barred into once-reputable journals, there's a half-hearted move on the part of TRAs to justify themselves by referring, in a hand-waving manner, to 'the latest science'. The idea seems to be to use 'the latest science' to one-up those who come at them with plain 'science'
Thank fcuk for Brexit! Now we just have to stop the Ladydick Left from getting their damned “conversion therapy” bill in.
Satan is having a field day amongst our illiberal Western elites. Thanks for this article revealing just how extreme the situation has now become. What used to be fringe and suspicious is now being paraded as mainstream and normative. To call it insanity is, alas, to grossly underestimate the full sordid depth of what is going on.
Thanks for a brilliant round-up, again.
Did you get an answer from the EMA about what how we’re supposed to understand the word “women” in their communicuations?
I got wind of their ICH E21 guideline during the consultation phase. I made a mental note to contribute but in the end I didn’t. The superficial excuse is that I didn’t have time but the truth is that I would have found time if I didn’t feel that it was just a PR exercise and that they’ll do whatever they want anyway.
On a broader level, I’m very uneasy about this new drive to recruit pregnant women into clinical studies of experimental medicines. I hate the way it's being reframed as a rights issue. If the clinical trial guidelines are changed, I'm sure that once again it's the most vulnerable women whose unborn babies will be harmed.