The Weekly Peak #3
Drug safety agency is de-sexing language, EU officials are gooning at work, and my fake daughter's breasts are getting amputated
European drug safety agency is de-sexing (some) language
Last month I noticed that the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Amsterdam-based EU body that decides which drugs are safe for human consumption, had replaced sexed language (woman, female) with bizarre physiology-based descriptors like “lactating individuals” and “individuals of child-bearing potential”.
The terms appeared in the context of new guidelines for designing clinical trials that include pregnant and breastfeeding women. So I checked in with the EMA press contact and I was able to confirm that yes, another reputable institution has been lobotomised by the genderborg. We’re inclusive now, said the birthing unit in the press department. “Language is inherently dynamic, and any effort to develop guidance will inevitably leave room for inconsistencies and gaps. We will continue striving to offer language that is as inclusive as possible and that reflects the diversity embodied in science,” I was told.
But bizarrely, when I went through more recent materials, I couldn’t find any other instances of this function-first policy. For example, the word ‘woman’ is still being used to refer to people at risk of contraceptive-linked venous thromboembolism (VTE). I asked the EMA if they could clarify what on earth the professionals who rely on this information (and us plebs) are supposed to understand by the word ‘woman’ in their communications from now on — is it gender identity, or the female of the species? Is it the inclusive meaning, or the bigotted one?
According to the inclusive policy, surely we should be referred to as “populations at risk of venous thromboembolism” or perhaps “venous thromboembolism-people”? You need clear language when you want to properly assess risk, one way or the other. This is not it.
Fetishistic transvestites are openly gooning in the EU institutions
The reason I got fired from my EU contractor job last month is because I was being very annoying about sex-based protections in the Commission workplace, and in EU law generally. Among the people who really wanted me gone — and there were a lot of them — were some autogynephilic males.
At least two of these men are “out” at work — meaning, they wear their fetishistic costumes openly in their public functions. And there’s not a damn thing their colleagues — including the women they have to share offices and bathrooms with — can do about it.
One of the men is more ostentatiously gooning than the other: his fantasy involves being a little girl (this is technically autopeadophilia combined with autogynephilia meaning he’s not just attracted to himself as a female, he’s attracted to himself as a female child). He wears gingham and gothic baby-doll dresses to the office and his work profile picture shows him in a frilly dress with pigtails, holding a teddy bear. His work has something to do with nuclear energy.
The second guy has a much more subtle masturbation fixation: skintight pants, a relatively common fetish in the compendium of crossdressing-related fetishes. Lycra Guy has many off-hours hobbies that involve tight materials that hug (and expose) the crotch area, such as surfing, yoga-ing, and aerial rope (the SFW version of BDSM roleplay). He also goes out in public dressed as Spider Girl a lot, which involves — you guessed it — wearing skintight Lycra leggings.
But from what I could tell, Lycra Guy has been managing to keep his fetish away from the office. So his…habits… are absolutely none of my business, as long as he keeps it in the bedroom, I guess. Sure. But I checked his LinkedIn account and it seems that about 2 years ago he showed up to work at an EU career fair in Luxembourg wearing tight black yoga pants, tastefully paired with a blue EU jumper.
He felt the need to explain in the LinkedIn post why he was wearing such inappropriate gear at a professional, public-facing event, just in case an observer started to wonder, bigottedly, about his motivations: he had “yoga in afternoon,” he doth protest. If you’re concerned that he might have given himself sweaty balls manning a stand all day in skintight synthetics, don’t: he had his auto-castration fantasy fulfilled thanks to the EU staff health insurance scheme, JSIS, which also covers sex changes for EU officials’ children.
It’s just all so incredibly wholesome, don’t you think?
Update: my (fake) sad teenage daughter is getting her breasts eliminated in Spain in September
I’m currently working out some ‘gender affirming care’ in Europe for my fake trans children, and I just booked breast amputation for my very young, very mentally ill, very fake daughter. The surgery will take place in Spain in September.
Once the mastectomy booking was locked down, I asked the Madrid clinic if my sad “son” — who they believe is 15 years old — can also get his ovaries and uterus removed and his vagina sewn shut, a service I found on their menu of ‘affirming’ interventions. Unfortunately, the surgeon’s assistant told me, “he” will have to wait until “he” is 18 for that because it’s irreversible (whereas your breasts can be fished out of the bin and attached back on??)
I’m collecting data from around Europe, and so far I can confirm: Germany, Malta and Spain allow surgeries on minors based on parental consent, and all you need to do is to find a ruthless enough surgeon in a private clinic, of which there seem to be plenty. The woman in the Madrid clinic told me on the phone: kids can do what they want in Spain, transition-wise, from the age of 12, as long as their parents agree.
Hungary failed the ‘values’ vibe check, a worrying first
The Court of Justice’ ruling against Hungary in the LGBTIQ ‘propaganda law’ case has caused an unusual amount of fanfare. The NGOs are delighted, of course, and now they’re applying the pressure to incoming PM Peter Magyar to get busy filling little Hungarian’s kids’ school curriculum full of UNESCO-approved noncey sex-swap fantasies.
But noises came from other quarters, too, raising concerns about the unusual nature of the decision: the Court explicitly ruled that the law violated EU values, not just market-related rules.
Athena Forum wrote that the ruling “risks turning the Union’s foundational principles into an open-ended basis for intervention in areas that remain primarily within Member State competence, such as education or aspects of family law”. In ‘Two things can be wrong at the same time: Orbán’s bans and the CJEU ruling’, Athena draw attention to the borg language that features throughout the judgement, saying that “courts should not adopt contested ideological language in their reasoning.”
Where do we go from here?
Where is it currently illegal to say ‘“trans women are men”?
The Commission stepped on its own dick recently by tweeting out its appreciation for free speech. The response, predictably, was not pretty. But what a lot of commentators fail to realise, I think, is that though the Commission is by nature censorious, it never did manage to pass an EU-level law instructing national governments to criminalise speech (beyond a 2008 law on expressions of racism, which some countries failed to transpose properly).
The infamous Digital Services Act is not a law that forbids hate talk per se. It threatens social media owners with huge fines for letting normies say hateful things on their platforms. But the meaning of hate varies across the EU, and the mission to harmonise the definition is not going well. A proposal circulated in 2021 on adding hate crimes to the EU treaty but it got nowhere. Attempts to revive it in 2023/2024 failed to get past the Council, too. I tried to find out if it was just Orban who was blocking it, but apparently as many as 10 countries have reservations, I’m told by someone with knowledge of the discussions, and the topic hasn’t come up since April 2025.
Anyway, for personal reasons, I decided to make a list of countries that have added ‘gender identity’ as a protected characteristic to their domestic hate speech regulations, but it turned out it’s easier to list the countries that have not done so. In the following places, you can still freely say “trans women are men in party-shop wigs, and most of them have a fetish”: Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia.
Poland had a bill ready to pass which would have made it illegal to say “autogynephilia is a sexual compulsion and it’s the reason why men pretend to be women”. The bill was not very popular, and it was struck down by the former administration. However, the new, Brussels-friendly government is trying to rev the idea back up by introducing ‘special units’ of prosecutors around the country tasked with punishing prejudice-motivated speech, according to a January article by Brussels Signal.
Better scratch Poland off your TERF political asylum list, just in case.
Bigotted Dutch Nazi women don’t want 110 single unemployed men from deeply misogynistic cultures dumped in their town
If you talk about this you get called mean names, but if you ignore it you’re actually a fucking coward. So pick your poison.
It has always darkly-amused me that we harangue European boys (of all colours and creeds) for their assumed, built-in ‘toxicity’ and then just like, airdrop crowds of bored and horny young lads from the worst places on Earth into housing estates full of kids.
Dutch women are made of stern stuff, and they took to the streets last weekend in a town called Loosdrecht for a very peaceful protest against the plans to install 110 male asylum seekers in the town hall. The protest was very civilised, in contrast to the male-heavy riots that have been taking place, and so far, the left-wing Dutch press has largely avoided calling them fascists, except for this performative lib who says the women are ‘hateful’.
It’s not the job of European women and girls to be the shock-absorbers of transplanted cultural misogyny, but European governments seem to think it is. It’s the reason why this review of comprehensive sexuality education in Austrian schools criticises facilitators for not focussing enough on the topic of migration in the sex ed curriculum. Now why would migration be a factor in sex education? When I was in school, I was told how to insert a tampon into my fajutz and take it out before I got a staph infection. There were no asylum seekers involvedin the process. But sex ed is now a vehicle for all kinds of weird shit, including teaching boys from knuckle-dragging cultural contexts that European women and girls are not their sexual property.
Apropos of absolutely nothing: around 46.3% of all Viennese residents were either born abroad or have foreign citizenship, and 41% of all children in the school system in the city are Muslim. Austria used to take migrants from Yugoslavia and Turkey, but now it’s Afghanistan and Syria. These are places that hate women so much that they are all fucking each other.
Yeah I get it, we need workers etc. But it’s ok to talk about this policy’s implications on things other than GDP, whatever that is.
Read: City of Vienna demographic facts and figures (2025)
Transgender lobby urges EU to merge ‘gender’ with ‘gender identity’ in foreign policy
European countries are under pressure to fill the funding gap left behind by USAID, and a major pillar of the US foreign aid was LGBTIQ rights, including codifying ‘third gender’ males as women in order to get them into HIV treatment (because they have craaaaaazyyyy high rates of HIV, and because they are a ‘bridge’ population).
Transgender Europe, (fully paid for by the EU budget) is asking that ‘gender’ in the new policy be *explicitly* redefined to mean gender identity. This was always the strategy, but I have never seen it stated so openly. The need to hide trans ideology inside other themes, but especially women’s rights, is presumably more urgent than ever because people are growing tired, to put it mildly, of queer activist overreach. The big danger of this: gender could get retrofitted to have always meant gender identity. We have always been at war with Eastasia.
The EU research plan is getting trooned
This is how it happens: very quietly and very unceremoniously.
Previous research programmes required gender equality plans, but the new arrangement, post-2027, is to have inclusive gender action plans, which means exactly what you think it means: it’s all getting transed up the swanny. Public bodies and institutions will all be tested on their inclusivity in order to get access to funds. A thousand tiny stupid cuts.
From the horse’s mouth: “The ERA Policy Agenda 2025-2027 prioritises gender equality through its structural policy 'Strengthening gender equality and inclusiveness in the ERA, notably with an intersectional approach'.”
Genspect: “Ireland’s Spending Spree on Trans Surgeries Abroad”
Here’s Irish journalist Paddy O’Gorman writing for Genspect: “The Irish health service has massively increased its spend on sending Irish patients abroad for transgender surgical treatments. Spending for this purpose rose from €21,000 in 2022 to over €333,000 in 2024.” That’s a sixteen-fold increase in just two years, and covers 162 individual claims. I agree with Paddy speculation: “I think we will find that, through the Treatment Abroad Scheme, we have paid for far more breasts to be cut off than penises.”
Spanish researchers make shocking discovery: sex matters
If you list your gender identity instead of your sex on medical intake forms, your test results will come out all skewed. Meaning, if a man who likes to wear baby doll dresses commits the paper-based deception of pretending to be female, the medical test results will likely fall in the ‘wrong’ ranges, if he’s healthy, and the right ranges if he’s sick. Men and women are different, is what I’m understanding from this study. Something to ponder.
Novel about ‘sworn virgins’ shortlisted for the Booker Prize
There’ve been some woeful efforts by Western academics to claim various terrible cultural phenomena as ‘transgender’ identities. The worst example is probably the bacha bazi: Pakistani and Afghani boys who are forced to dress up in girl’s salwar kameez and dance for rich men who then rape them. This paedophilia-crossdressing-rape phenomenon is very handy “trans people have always existed!!11!!” propaganda.
A new novel called She Who Remains, written by Bulgarian author Rene Karabash, is a story about Albania’s version of a similar phenomenon: girls and women who were allowed to ‘live as men’, for reasons that have little to do with personal autonomy and everything to do with living in a patriarchy. The book has been shortlisted for the Booker Prize.
Karabash has presented the sworn virgins phenomenon as a performative social adaptation rooted in patriarchal necessity. I’ve reached out to her, and she’s open to an interview. Sounds pretty TERFy!
Extract from She Who Remains on the Booker Prize website
Why is Northern Ireland like that?
I talked to TERF Sara Morrison about Northern Ireland’s non-profit sector and how it chewed her up and spat her out.
In other news…
The gender equality club of a French school has named a room after sports cheat Imane Khelif
This Saturday night, French lesbians go live on Sophie Robert’s Dragon Bleu TV
New LGTBIQ channel in Hungary doesn’t look like it’s an EU-funded thing, as far as I can tell from scraping all the usual sources.
Kindred in Chaos: new book of 19 testimonies from lesbians in the era of queer. I interviewed the authors, interview out next week
The EU parliament wants a law on expressly-expressed consent-based rape. Hmmmm.
More and more Power Gays are buying babies. What’s up with that.
Send me your stories, I’m all (t)ears: roisinmichaux@gmail.com. I’m also on X/Twitter: https://x.com/RoisinMichaux
"He wears gingham and gothic baby-doll dresses to the office and his work profile picture shows him in a frilly dress with pigtails, holding a teddy bear."
JFC! Having to work with a fetishist like that in an office! If a woman tried this she'd be told in no uncertain terms that she was unprofessional. But pull out the gender card and you'll be indulged.
“Language is inherently dynamic... We will continue striving to offer language that is as inclusive as possible and that reflects the diversity embodied in science.”
It‘s funny how people and institutions immediately start to sound like robots as soon as they go full gender ideology. That quote starts with a platitude and ends in pretty much nothing. For it to make a relevant point, shouldn't it go on to explain how and why the ‘diversity embodied in science’ implies that the 'individuals of child-bearing potential' aren't necessarily 'women'? But that would be telling, wouldn't it?
Now that a crap body of literature backing gender ideology has been crow-barred into once-reputable journals, there's a half-hearted move on the part of TRAs to justify themselves by referring, in a hand-waving manner, to 'the latest science'. The idea seems to be to use 'the latest science' to one-up those who come at them with plain 'science'