The Weekly Peak #11
Hateful data, Tiny Numbers Theory, Gay Games' grapple, and a literal DEMON
Tradwife activist convicted for saying black and Arabic immigrant men are a threat to French women
Norway gender doctors gross misconduct story is not what it seems
Belgian doctor is lying, says mother, about what happens to kids in his gender clinic
France wonders out loud: should men have jobs that involve children?
Me on WDI talking about my dismissal for TERFing
Rainbow waistcoat of transvestite paedophile was exhibited at a Pride expo
UK women may turn out not to be women in Northern Ireland
Money still going to fight Budapest Pride ban even though Pride is no longer banned
Women on Boards law: it’s been quite the gender journey
Gay Games takes a chance on male-on-female violence, but inserts insurance clauses
Who can we thank?
In other news…
Tradwife activist convicted for saying black and Arabic immigrant men are a threat to French women
“Thaïs d’Escufon” is the nom d’influenceuse of Anne-Thaïs du Tertre d’Escoeuffant, a young French femonationalist of aristocratic extraction who has been active on the identarian anti-immigration activist scene since she was a teenager. She was the articulate and pretty TV-ready youth spokeswoman for the group Génération Identitaire until the French state dissolved it in 2021 for its militia-like tactics and promotion of anti-immigration-flavoured hate.
In 2023 she was invited on TV to weigh in on a rape case involving a man who was under a deportation order. Rather than just condemn the man, she condemned French immigration policy and singled out black and Arab immigrant men as the principal perpetrators of sex crimes against women. Yikes.
“The primary danger for women in France,” she said, “is immigration and its disastrous consequences.” A journalist on the panel pushed back: “The main danger for women is men.” D’Escufon agreed, but added: “It’s men — Black African and Arab immigrants.”
This statement is likely based largely on intuition and personal experience because France doesn’t record ethnicity data, and what exists to serve as evidence for her statement is quite old, and predates more recent waves of inward migration). In that sense the journalist sparring with D’Escufon was correct to call her out on it. But quand même, d’Escufon was pointing to a very real, very obvious, very hush-hush phenomenon that has been shown to be true in many other EU countries.
Her haters in the general gauchosphere are correct in saying that most violence against women is committed by men they know, in their own home. But regime feminists overly obsess over this point in order to avoid addressing another much more inconvenient source of sexual violence, which is the statistical phenomenon that d’Escufon was pointing out. French-on-French domestic violence notwithstanding, unmoored gentlemen from cultures that teach boys that unveiled, bare-shouldered girlbosses are whores for the taking — are overrepresented in the sexual crime stats in Europe.
Two things can be true at once.
These men arrive in a Europe where they are bottom of the barrel, status-wise, and to see all us women lord it over them in any way must drive them bananas. This has nothing at all to do with “race” and everything to do with culture and circumstance. Bettina Arndt wrote about it here, calling it the Clash of sexual civilisations.
According to data, what d’Escufon said is directionally correct, at least according to hard data from other EU countries (it’s particularly robust from Sweden) even if it could do with some caveats. Here are some figures: of 97 rapes recorded in public spaces in Paris in 2023, fewer than a third were solved, and of the 36 perpetrators arrested, 28 were of foreign nationality — that’s 77%. In Germany in 2023, foreigners were 41.2% of suspects in violent crimes, and around a third of all suspects in rape and sexual offences, despite making up only around 15% of the population. Of the 3,039 individuals convicted of rape against a woman in Sweden between 2000 and 2015, 59.2% had an immigrant background, with 47.7% born outside Sweden. That is an extraordinary figure given that the foreign-born population is roughly 20% of Sweden's total.
Non-Western immigrant men — including those of North African and sub-Saharan African origin — are substantially overrepresented in sexual crime statistics and convictions across multiple Western European countries, and this overrepresentation persists after controlling for the demographic and socioeconomic factors most commonly cited to explain it away. (I’ve put all the relevant links at the bottom of this article).
D’Escufon was convicted this week for “injure publique” (public injury, like slander). She was not convicted for lying, she was convicted because she stigmatised a group based on “l’origine, l’ethnie, la nation ou la race”. The judge did not dispute the statistical basis, but French law does not require the statement to be false for it to be illegal (it would be funny, indeed, if the transcript of the judgement reveals that the judge agreed her comments were based on data — because then that judge might find him or herself on the wrong side of the same law d’Escufon was convicted of).
The prosecutor had called for an unsuspended prison sentence, but d’Escufon got away with a fine. The same thing happened to Belgian far-right personality Dries Van Langenhove recently, who presented Belgian ethnic crime stats based on ethnicity at a university lecture.
The judge in that case said "Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law."
d’Escufon’s conviction is also worth comparing with the clownish condemnation of Dora Moutot who was found guilty of public insult for saying “As women we are obliged to be wary of people with penises”. The prosecutor wanted Moutot charged with public insult against all men, but in the end she was punished for insults against transvestites, who also have penises. Dora was represented by the Charlie Hebdo lawyers who have had to defend some seriously heinous shit down through the years, and she still lost. The case is being appealed.
The French love scrapping over politics, especially around the dinner table but especially-especially on TV (they all talk over each other like a tree full of parakeets, it’s hilarious), and I wonder what kind of effect this will have on their ability to continue enjoying this noisy national pastime. Anyone at any time can get accused of saying something that’s provably true but inconvenient for social harmony, or hurty to knicker adventurers who wish we would all pretend they are gals like me and you.
Regime feminists continue to blame a nebulous, just-out-of-frame, all-enveloping mist of cishet colonial white patriarchy for all their woes. The roving gangs of aimless and horny men who are raised on the mantra “a woman without a veil is like an unwrapped lollipop that attracts flies” — they cannot be blamed because gender professionals have sunk too much cost into postmodern identity politics. These women are on the dark side of the moon right now. It’s “the system”, it’s the lack of youth centres, it’s the welfare cuts, it’s climate change, it’s deforestation, it’s cis white gays, it’s the TERFs, it’s Israel and so on. Forget the data. The data is extreme right.
Norway gender doctors gross misconduct story is not what it seems
The Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten is reporting that three gender doctors linked to the national gender service have been found guilty of gross misconduct by an ethics committee after they used patient data without ethical clearance. Because these are “affirming” doctors, it might seem as though the finding was a condemnation of the gender-affirming care model (that’s certainly what’s been circulating on social media). But that’s not quite what happened.
What happened is that these three researchers had tried to get permission to use patient data from a gender clinic in order to track trajectories and outcomes of the young people under their care. They didn’t get permission, but they used the anonymised data anyway. And what the data showed, and what they published in four separate papers, suggests that the ethics complaint against them was just as likely to have been triggered by angry trans activists as by those on the other side of the gender debate. Indeed, it turns out that among the whistleblowers was PKI, a trans-patient advocacy group
Their findings confirmed what has been found already elsewhere: a huge increase in females claiming to be trans starting around 2014, and an extremely high level of mental illnesses and self-harm among them, all of which, they caution, necessitate much more careful evaluation of each individual patient. The affirmation-only activists did not like this.
The story is instructive in the sense that it sheds light on a group of middle-grounders in the gender medicine debate who don’t often get talked about. They can be placed somewhere along the spectrum between raging TERFs and raging trans activists. These are professional doctors who adhere to what Stella O’Malley of Genspect has termed “Tiny Numbers Theory”. They don’t tend to believe that anyone is really trans. However, they do believe that there is, out there, a tiny number of people who would truly benefit from social and medical transition to ease their distress. They see it as their job to properly screen for, and select, these people.
They, too, are alarmed at the affirmation-only, ideology-driven turn in “gender care” in the past decade and a half. But they don’t seem to realise that it’s this belief in the perfect transable subject that started — and perpetuates — all this nonsense in the first place. As long as it’s believed that some people should trans, the clinics will exist. As long as clinics exist, all kinds of malcontents will be queuing up outside it.
These people are direct descendants of the much hated “medical gatekeepers” of yore, the kind of doctors who haunted the dreams of transvestites before the age of affirmation (they did not haunt the dreams of autistic teenage tomboys, because that cohort had not yet been infected with the idea that their discomfort was due to being in the wrong body).
Quite a number of clinicians in the gender field adhere to Tiny Number Theory, and their commitment to this belief may doom the entire project to last forever.
Belgian doctor is lying, claims mother, about what happens to kids in his gender clinic
The newspaper La Libre is the most read respectable newspaper in Belgium, and they have published cartes blanche (opinion pieces) that question trans mania occasionally. Some of these opinion pieces were co-authored by me and my TERF friends but they cut us off like drunken punters recently, saying that until they get more input from the other side they would no longer publish our pieces
A couple of days ago, they seemed to have found someone, publishing a contribution by one Professor Alain Malchair, child and adolescent psychiatrist at the University of Liège, who argued for a careful, ethically grounded clinical approach to young people experiencing gender identity distress.
In the piece, he rejects both the dismissive “just a trend” framing as well as its opposite: the uncritical affirmation approach. Instead he calls for a prolonged, multidisciplinary accompaniment of the young person and their family aimed at deepening and authenticating the request before any medical intervention
He wrote that the modification of a healthy body, which flies in the face of Do No Harm can only be navigated on a case-by-case basis. Parental involvement essential, as is moderating the influence of social media. Sounds great, except I was contacted by an infuriated family who read Malchair’s wonderful words and as a result, put their trust in his clinic, only to have their very distressed daughter fast-tracked to hormones.
Here’s the account from the parents in question: “What he describes bears absolutely no resemblance to what happened to us. When our daughter announced the "news" to us a few years ago, I was lost, and I tried to understand and find help. I read Malchair’s description about the Liège gender identity centre — including all his talk about young people and approaching the problem holistically with a child psychiatrist, etc. It was the most reassuring thing I’d been able to find as a resource in Belgium. So I made an appointment. Here’s how it went:
One interview with my daughter alone with the crazy, gung-ho affirmation psychologist. We were allowed to join for 20 minutes at the end, where all our questions were minimised. (The doctor) managed to make us feel she was teaching us how to be parents, and that our daughter was far from having the serious psychiatric problems we thought she had. Ready-made pro-trans, soothing script — with lies. Then what followed: two more appointments for our daughter with her alone, then straight to the endocrinologist. When I expressed surprise that she wasn’t seeing a child psychiatrist or any psychiatrist, there was no explanation.”
Read the full article: An ethical stance on the suffering of young people questioning their identity (La Libre, 22 June 2026)
France wonders out loud: should men have jobs that involve children?
France is in the grip of an extremely gnarly and large-scale childcare abuse scandal, and it has people wondering: should men be allowed to supervise children, unsupervised?
According to a report in Marianne:
“We’ve reached such a level of tension in Paris, with these allegations of sexual assault, that next year, it’s clear: the city will no longer place any men in preschool classes,” a union representative for after-school activity leaders told Marianne. According to him, the allegations of assault at school most often concern the youngest children, aged 3 to 5.”
Since 2023, over 100 allegations have emerged from dozens of Parisian maternelles (kindergarten), primary schools, and daycare centres and 78 monitors have been suspended, 31 of them for suspected sexual abuse. As I was writing this, another man was arrested on suspicion of raping a four-year-old in his care at the school he was working at. Parents are raging. The mayor of Paris called it a systemic problem and has announced he is throwing €20 million at it.
Adding to the feeling that this is a systemic problem in France is the fact that the main suspect in the kidnap and murder of a little girl called Lyhanna had at least five complaints or reports filed against him, including rape allegations backed by forensic evidence, none of which led to charges or conviction. This has been described as a compounding cascade of procedural failures.
Some commentators have begun asking, with a fair bit of throat-clearing, whether men should work in early childcare at all. Not all abusers are male, they disclaim, and children benefit from male caregivers, sure sure sure.
But still. Publicly most people endorse the view that this would be silly and discriminatory, counterproductive, and retrograde. But when it comes to their own kids, they might privately breathe a sigh of relief upon reading all these stories knowing that the people who take care of their very vulnerable little ones are female. I would love a world where men aren’t prone to this, but that’s not the one we live in. Still, I don’t know what to think of these proposals. And how would it even work in a country where women can’t even state statistical likelihoods without getting dragged through the courts for years?
Me on WDI talking about my dismissal for TERFing
I was invited by the radfems of Woman’s Declaration International (sign it!!) to explain how and why I got the sack from the European Commission’s Directorate for the Single Market on 9 March 2026. The TLDR is: because I’m a TERF. I had a lawyer who was looking into getting cold, cold revenge on my behalf but he unceremoniously dumped me last week (perhaps also because I’m a TERF, but who knows).
The end?
Christian groups have made noises that suggest they may want to represent me in an unfair dismissal/freedom of belief-type claim. The Christians care a lot about free speech and I used to think it had something to do with praying outside abortion clinics or something, but I belatedly realised it’s actually probably this: most of their core beliefs have been reclassified as “hate speech” in the past decade so they’re fyyyyumin. Marriage is between a man and a woman = hate. You’re not a women trapped in a man’s body, you’re a sinner with a weird sexual compulsion = hate.
Christian beliefs were very commonly-held not so long ago, and still are in a large part of the world, so it’s no surprise the Christians are angry and willing to support heathens like myself to get some of these tyrannical dictates overturned.
I’d just like to point out that it feels extremely weird to be supported by fundamental Christians on one side and radical feminists on the other, while everyone in the middle treats you like you murdered their dog — even though they keep whispering at you that they agree with everything you say. I don’t really know how to interpret that. I don’t know what it says about the state of the world.
Rainbow waistcoat of transvestite paedophile was exhibited at a Pride expo
After this Belfast transvestite died, all the stories about him being a child sex abuser emerged. I guess people were triggered by all the praise that was heaped on him, knowing that he used to enjoy flashing his dick at children.
But even after all the (evidenced) allegations, a Northern Ireland art centre still decided to show off his gay waistcoat at a Pride expo, referring to him a “dyke”, just like he would have wanted (lots of fetishistic transvestites want you to pretend they are lesbians).
Northern Ireland Substacker/commentator Jenny Holland put it best when she said: “JUST LOOK AT HIM. He is quite literally a demon.”
UK women may turn out not to be women in Northern Ireland
Yesterday, 23 June 2026, was the ten-year anniversary of the Brexit vote.
If it were not for Brexit, there is quite a high chance that the For Women Scotland case (the one that reestablished some reality in the interpretation of equality law) would have ended up being referred to the utterly captured Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), and an equally high chance that the CJEU would have ruled in a more “trans-inclusive” way. The UK Supreme Court was able to TERF out and hew to biological reality because the UK is no longer bound by Brussels (or in the case of the CJEU, Luxembourg).
Here’s why: the question about the meaning of “woman” might have had to be settled in Europe because the relevant law (the Equality Act) is based on an EU-law (the Equal Treatment Directive).
Back in 1996, the word “sex” was expanded to include “gender reassignment” in discrimination after a case called P v S and Cornwall County Council, in which a transvestite claimed sex-based discrimination after he got the sack from his job after he started dressing as a woman at work. The case went to Europe and the judgement ended up expanded the meaning of “sex” to cover people like him in discrimination cases.
The UK Supreme Court in the For Women Scotland did consider P v S and Cornwall County Council, but decided it was not decisive for the definition of “sex” or “woman” in UK law. The wokesters at the CJEU show no similar signs of reasonableness on this topic. What’s more: if FWS had been referred to Luxembourg, the outcome would not only have shafted women and reality-enjoyers in the UK, it could have set the precedent for shafting all European Union member states.
I asked Anya Palmer, feminist lawyer and Forstater brain trust what she thinks of this and she agreed that it’s a possibility. But we’re not out of the woods yet, she added: “There may still be an EU angle, as the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland considers that EU law may still be relevant in Northern Ireland, and has asked the High Court in Belfast for permission to bring a judicial review on this. It's a very odd thing to do, to ask the court to declare in the abstract what the law is. Not how UK courts normally work!”
To be continued. But anyway, Happy Brexit anniversary, TERF Island.
Money still going to fight Budapest Pride ban even though Pride is no longer banned
There’s an EU project due to start next week that intends to fight Viktor Orban’s ban on Pride. Here are its objectives: to document and expose restrictive legislation and practice; to encourage challenging restrictions in European courts through strategic litigation; to empower stakeholders to resist the chilling effect.
But, I hear you object, Viktor Orban is gone, and Budapest is newly and enthusedly festooned with rainbows and the pink and blue of the paedophile/castration cult (though a line of Progress Pride flags lining a bridge on the Danube were torn down and dumped in the river almost immediately after they were put up). Surely the project which has not yet started, can be called off now that the problem it sought to fix has been fixed?
Apparently not? he Budapest-based NGO Háttér Társaság and the Hungarian Helsinki Committee will still pocket €113, 000 in public money to solve this phantom problem. Of course I contacted them to ask what they plan to do with the money, and of course they ignored me. Of course I contacted the European Commission and of course they ignored me.
As an aside, I wrote to a Brussels-based NGO called “Follow The Money” to tip them off as to the obviously scammy nature of the EU queer industry (we’re getting another EU-funded NGO for bisexual people!) but as soon the woman in charge twigged it was about This Topic she cooled on an initial offer of collaboration. She asked for evidence for my allegations that, uh, there’s something mighty weird about the reams of cash going to this ever-expanding roster of NGOs.
Rainbows are taking over our lives, nobody seems to want it, and yet the budget for it gets higher every year.
The question is not whether there is any evidence it’s happening. The question is do you think it’s an extremely odd that it’s clearly happening, and worth investigating who the hell is letting it happen. What can you do to get people to pay attention to LGTBIQ’s capture of our institutions? Same thing as you could do to get Jimmy Savile investigated, or a priest condemned for abusing children, or concerns raised about the pain pill mill at the height of the Oxycontin scandal, or the alarm raised about the subprime mortgage house of cards that ultimately led to the global financial crash….Absolutely fucking nothing.
Like the LGBTIQ stuff, these were all open secrets, propped up by money and/or individuals’ need to maintain their social and professional reputations. Everyone knows something is up, but nobody says anything.
I’ll keep emailing everyone and they’ll keep ignoring me. But I’ve got all the receipts.
Women on Boards law: it’s been quite the gender journey
This law has been gestating for a decade: proposed in 2012, it finally passed in 2022, but a decade is a long time in genderfaff. While the original 2012 draft was clear (there are too few women on corporate boards, here is a quota to fix it), what it means after a decade of transing and genderfying everything is much more open to interpretation. The very concepts it was once based on have become legally warped.
This will likely create conundrums for companies: the law doesn’t say if the 40% quota of women on corporate boards is based on biological sex or gender identity. And the introduction by some member states of a legal category of something called non-binary, makes the mathematics of “underrepresented sex” entertainingly unstable. The 40% math just isn’t mathing when there are three variables. Austria, Germany, Iceland and Malta already recognise non-binary gender on identity documents and Belgium just joined them in April.
For a multinational listed across several EU member states, it could be a compliance headache. The deadline to turn it into binding law is 30 June in 27 different legal systems with different ideas about how many sexes there are (there are two. Two sexes.)
Fun trivia: the For Women Scotland case was about a corporate boards quota, as it happens.
Gay Games takes a chance on male-on-female violence, but inserts insurance clauses
There’s a Facebook page that I enjoy called “Warnings and disclaimers that were clearly the result of a lawsuit” and it’s people posting notices that were necessitated by, well, some kind of unfortunate shenanigans. Here’s that but trans-related:
The following statement appeared on the website of the Gay Games recently :
“The competition categories used for the Wrestling and Grappling events have now been altered to correct an error which does not align with the values and needs of our community, specifically related to trans and non-binary identities.”
The “error” that has now been corrected can be understood from the new rule: male and female categories in wrestling and grappling are from now on to be based on preferred gender, and legal documents to prove your actual sex will no longer be required. Athletes can now compete in whichever category fits their inner gender vibes.
You can just imagine how it unfolded: pissed off queerists complained that recognising the strength and size differentials between men and women, and making policy choices based on the acute relevance of that differential in combat sports, is DiScRimInAtorY.
While I was trying to figure out who exactly had had led the call-out campaign that forced the policy change, I stumbled upon an internal Google doc about it (in which some doofus had neglected to remove the track changes). The text says that nobody is required to get a license from their governing body this year, and licenses usually cover insurance and eligibility. So it’s a free-for-all. I wonder if the organisers are nervous? The emphasis on athletes getting their own insurance might be illustrative (it’s not a general condition for participation in the Gay Games).
Anyway, everyone knows who the men are and everyone knows who the women are, at the end of the day. May the best man win.
Who can we thank? Helena Dalli
Helena Dalli was Miss Malta and a bit-part actress before she pivoted to politics to work on a bunch of equality-flavored portfolios. She managed to ram through wins on civil unions, same-sex marriage, transgender self-ID laws, and anti-discrimination expansions that made Malta look very progressive on paper. For her efforts, she was awarded the first ever Equality portfolio by Ursula von der Leyen in the European Commission, a gig invented out of the froth of the Summer of Floyd when everyone was trying to be extra pious. This job let her faff around with strategies, guidelines, and moral lectures, and while it was mostly just performative sludge, it veered into weirdo gender ideology territory with the LGBTIQ Strategy and Gender Equality Strategy, which accelerated self-ID expansions and advanced the idea that male and female are social constructs, much to the disadvantage to women who depend on single-sex spaces and services.
She’s the one who came up with “inclusive communication” guidelines urging EU staff to swap “Christmas” for generic “holiday season,” ditch “ladies and gentlemen” for the sterile “Dear All,” and to use exotic names in official comms like Malika and Julio instead of boring European ones. A low-stakes role that typified elite disconnect.
Here she is. Say thanks to Helena.
In other news…
Rebel Girls by Sybilla Claus is now available in English. Launch event tomorrow 25/06/2025 (you have to register)
EU is transing everything while pretending to be transing nothing, a small selection: Transing Irish healthcare, transing sport, Forcing everyone to pretend non-binary is real, looking for hate speech incidents in public and private spheres and recording them
On 23 June the European Parliament stopped short of calling for trans healthcare in a women’s health initiative. They still got transgender in there as though it’s a real thing, but no call for “affirming care”. I consider it a minor victory and I’m taking partial credit for cyberbullying everyone about it for the past few months.
Irish lunatic calls for non-binary and intersex recognition like it’s 2020
Even the far right in Italy is leaning into gender identity?
Woman takes on Sweden’s lax paedophile laws, by Julie Bindel
“Don’t be Hitler” is Europeans’ moral operating system: Great episode of Louise Perry’s Maiden Mother Matriarch podcast that articulates how Hitler became our moral North Star after the collapse of the church. Instead of What would Jesus do, we’ve got What would Hitler not do?
We are wholly unprepared for the disability civil rights era. It’s getting added to political priorities, and funding pots are getting filled
Looksmaxxing self-proclaimed misogynist Clavicular looked very silly in Paris in a livestream where he failed to find any women who know him, ever mind go weak at the knees in his presence. “Few of the women he approached seemed to know who he was and even fewer cared to find out.” His explanation is that they are all lesbians.
Homophobic attacks in Dutch asylum centre. LGBTIQ asylum seekers got their own wing, but for some reason they let a straight guy in and he tried to seemed to want to kill gay people
A complaint for transphobic discrimination has been filed against the American consulate in Paris because the Americans won’t recognise “non-binary” Roblox-inspired identity fantasies of weirdos with fluorescent hair as a real thing that exists. The complaints targets unnamed individuals working in the embassy.
Send me your stories, I’m all (t)ears: roisinmichaux@gmail.com. I’m also on X/Twitter: https://x.com/RoisinMichaux
Do you think it matters that sex is being replaced by self-declaration of something called ‘gender identity’? I do, and I was fired for it. I made a bet that other people care about it too. So this newsletter is my new job. If you think my work is important, please take out a paid subscription.
References for sex crime stats
Germany
BKA 2023 annual crime statistics (via European Conservative summary):
https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/germany-violent-crime-climbs-to-historic-highs/
NZZ analysis of BKA 2024 data on foreign national overrepresentation:
https://www.nzz.ch/english/germanys-muddled-response-to-crimes-involving-foreign-nationals-ld.1879233
BKA/Federal Police 2024 report on newly arrived migrants (Syrian/Afghan rates per 100,000) via Chronicle AI summary:
https://chronicleai.org/article/germany-grapples-with-complexities-of-migrant-crime-statistics-amidst-shifting-demographic-landscape
Wikipedia summary of BKA data on North African overrepresentation vs other groups:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_crime_in_Germany
Euronews on 2025 BKA figures (35.5% foreign suspects, sexual offences rising):
https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/04/20/crime-rates-in-germany-are-falling-but-sexual-offences-are-significantly-on-the-rise
Sweden
Lund University / Khoshnood et al. 2026 peer-reviewed study (21-year follow-up, PMC):
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12662818/
Same study on ResearchGate:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387761806_Immigrant_Background_and_Rape_Conviction_A_21-Year_Follow-Up_Study_in_Sweden
2021 peer-reviewed study (2000–2015 convictions, 59.2% immigrant background):
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8330751/
SVT/Wikipedia summary of 2018 investigation (58% foreign background, 40% Middle East and Africa, stranger rape 75% born outside Europe):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_Sweden
France
INSEE/SSMSI official data on foreign suspects by region of origin (2019, Sécurité et société):
https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/5763585?sommaire=5763633
INSEE/SSMSI on public transport violence — North Africans 19% of foreign suspects for violence including sexual violence (via Remix News citing INSEE):
https://rmx.news/article/france-64-of-robberies-physical-attacks-and-sexual-assaults-on-public-transport-in-paris-are-committed-by-foreigners-43-from-north-african-countries/
Senate response confirming SSMSI 13% figure for sexual violence and breakdown methodology:
https://www.senat.fr/questions/base/2024/qSEQ241000829.htm
Assemblée nationale response confirming SSMSI publishes Maghreb-disaggregated data:
https://questions.assemblee-nationale.fr/q17/17-9474QE.htm
Huerre gang rape study and CNRS Grenoble data (cited via Le Salon Beige aggregation — note this is a right-leaning site, so you would want to go to the primary sources it cites):
https://lesalonbeige.fr/lien-entre-immigration-et-delinquance-les-10-preuves-scientifiques-et-sourcees/
Prison population breakdown (54% Africa and Maghreb) via Senate debate:
https://www.senat.fr/questions/base/2022/qSEQ22100233S.html
Shameful that Moutot was fined for telling the truth about immigrant men. When women are told “not all men”! She says, “okay what about these specific men?” “No don’t say that either, even if it’s true.” Of course men who come from countries where women have less rights, less sexual autonomy and and less access to justice would cause them to view women as less human. If the French are worried about inciting hatred against a group the law and culture does it itself against women every day.
Hi Roisin! You were a huge success on WDI last weekend. You certainly are worth every cent of our subscriptions.
Personnzlly, I think that what keeps French feminists in particular and other people from fighting this trans trend more robustly is their attachment to the illusory "values of the Left". It's a myth, but it divides women as the Dora Moutot's case show. We'll live to regret it.
Anyway, here's to sisterhood in terfing!
Annie Gouilleux