6 Comments
User's avatar
Kat Highsmith's avatar

This shows that the state CAN punish criminals when it wants to, so any claims that something is impossible just shows its lack of will.

Some of the purest anarcho-tyranny I've seen.

Feral Finster's avatar

In the West today, there is only the "friend-enemy" distinction.

"Friends" are permitted everything and the law serves their interests.

"Enemies" are permitted nothing and every law that can be brought to bear is used to persecute them.

That is all.

eLeF's avatar

Even if a person is convicted it’s defamation, it’s all just so 360 mental

Andy's avatar
Jul 7Edited

Agree! Why do the Swedish people put up with nonsense like this? The word sheeple is bandied around a lot but I’m starting to think it applies perfectly to them (I have other terms in mind but I want to keep things classy).

Andy's avatar

The laws definitely need to change - I hope the campaign is successful. At the moment, it seems that Sweden upholds a Paedophile’s Charter!

Even taking the law as it stands, it makes no sense to me that it’s OK for media outlets to publish info about the paedophile but not OK when a private citizen publishes the same information - even if the private citizen only gives a link to the media outlet. How is this rationalised?

Aurora Johnson's avatar

Amazing report, thank you. California has Scott Weiner, though, unfortunately-- potentially protecting the perpetrators instead of the vulnerable.